Flor v. Holguin (Order Suspending Time Requriements of HRAP Rule 40(d))

NO. 22641

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

KATHLEEN M. FLOR,

Claimant-Appellant,

vs.

CARLOS RICHARD HOLGUIN, D.D.S.,

and

PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,

Employer/Insurance

Carrier-Appellee,

and

DOUGLAS H. DIERENFIELD, D.D.S.,

and

TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Employer/Insurance

Carrier-Appellee,

and

WILLIAM R. BABBITT, D.D.S.,

and

PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,

Employer/Insurance

Carrier-Appellee,

and

CARLOS RICHARD HOLGUIN, D.D.S.,

and

ISLAND INSURANCE COMPANY,

Employer/Insurance

Carrier-Appellee,

and

WILLIAM R. BABBITT, D.D.S.,

and

CRAWFORD AND COMPANY,

Employer/Insurance

Carrier-Appellee.

________________________________

CASE NO. AB 98-077(WH)

(9-97-00450)

(9-97-00451)

(9-97-00452)

(9-96-01636)

(9-96-01660)

ORDER SUSPENDING TIME REQUIREMENT OF HRAP RULE 40(d)

Pursuant to HRAP Rules 2 and 26(b), the time requirement of HRAP Rule 40(d) is hereby suspended, and the time in which this court shall dispose of the pending motions for reconsideration is extended through August 30, 2000.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, July 3, 2000.

FOR THE COURT:

______________________

RONALD T.Y. MOON

Chief Justice