IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI`I
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
STATE OF HAWAI`I, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee
vs.
DANIEL E. K. SHINYAMA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CR. NO. 99-0457(2))
ORDER
(By: Ramil, J.)
Upon consideration of Respondent/Defendant-Appellant Daniel E. K. Shinyama's motion for order to strike the application for writ of certiorari filed by Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii, the papers in support, and the records and files herein, it appears that the application for a writ of certiorari filed by the State of Hawaii does not comply with the requirements set forth in Rules 32(a) and 32(b) of the Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Arleen Y. Watanabe,
Esq., attorney for Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee, shall, within 10 days
after the date of this order, show cause as to why she should not be sanctioned
for failing to comply with HRAP Rules 32(a) and 32(b). Failure to respond
to this order may result in sanctions.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to strike the application for writ of certiorari is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, February 14, 2002.
Deborah L. Kim, Deputy
Public Defender, on
the motion