NO. 24310
vs.
ADMINISTRATIVE
DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS, STATE OF HAWAI`I,
Respondent-Appellee
Upon carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised, we hold that the district court did not err by affirming the hearing officer's revocation of Hirosane's driver's license, inasmuch as Hirosane does not dispute and the record supports the hearing officer's conclusions that (1) Hirosane "was involved in a motor vehicle collision vesting the police with reasonable suspicion to detain [Hirosane] during its investigation," (2) "[t]here existed reasonable suspicion for the stop of [Hirosane's] motor vehicle," (3) "[t]here existed probable cause to believe that [Hirosane] drove, operated, or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor," and (4) "[t]he evidence proves by a preponderance that [Hirosane] drove, operated, or was in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor." See HRS §§ 286-259(e)(1), (2), and (3) (Supp. 2000). As such, this court need not address whether Hirosane was informed of the sanctions for refusing to take a breath or blood test. See Spock v. Admin. Dir. of Courts, 96 Hawai`i 190, 193, 29 P.3d 380, 383 (2001). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment from which the appeal is taken is affirmed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, August 19, 2004.
On the briefs:
William A.
Harrison of
Harrison & Matsuoka
for petitioner-appellant
Christine B. Hirosane