NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NO. 25927
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI`I
STATE OF HAWAI`I, Plaintiff-Appellant,
APPEAL
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
(CR. NO.
02-1-2685)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
(By:
Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy JJ.)
Upon carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised, we resolve the prosecution's appeal as follows:
This court's decision in State v. Smith, 103 Hawai`i 228, 81 P.3d 408 (2003), is entirely dispositive of the present matter. Id. at 234, 81 P.3d at 414 (holding that "in all cases in which HRS § 706-606.5 is applicable, including those in which a defendant would otherwise be eligible for probation under HRS § 706-622.5, the circuit courts must sentence defendants pursuant to the provisions of HRS § 706-606.5"). Thus, given the "plain and unambiguous" ruling of this court in Smith, the circuit court erred in sentencing Souza pursuant to HRS § 706-622.5 instead of applying HRS § 706-606.5. Therefore,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the portion of the circuit court's judgment sentencing Souza pursuant to HRS § 706-622.5 is vacated, and we remand this matter to the circuit court for resentencing in accordance with the provisions of HRS § 706-606.5.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, February 17, 2004.
Donn Fudo,
deputy prosecuting
attorney, for
plaintiff-appellant
Steven Nichols,
deputy public
defender, for
defendant-appellant