*** NOT FOR PUBLICATION ***
NO. 26203
IN THE SUPREME
COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI`I
KIRK CAMERLINGO
and DOROTHY CAMER,
Plaintiffs-Appellants/Counterclaim Defendants
vs.
LORI J. KIM,
STEVEN J. KIM, WESLEY W. ICHIDA and PAUL A. LYNCH,
Defendants-Appellees/Counterclaimants
and
SCOT S. BROWER,
Counterclaim Defendant
APPEAL FROM THE
FIRST CIRCUIT COURT
(CIV. NO. 01-1-0297)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)
Upon review of the record, it appears that the July 29, 2003 judgment,
the Honorable Eden Elizabeth Hifo, presiding,
purports to be the HRCP 58 final judgment on the claims asserted in
Civil No. 01-1-0297. The judgment dismisses the
defendants' counterclaim, but does not enter judgment on the
plaintiffs' claims, as required by Jenkins v. Cades Schutte
Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai`i 115, 119-120, 869 P.2d 1334,
1338-39 (1994)(The separate judgment entered pursuant to
HRCP 58 must enter judgment in favor of and against the parties on the
claims resolved. "A statement that declares 'there
are no other outstanding claims' is not a judgment."). The reference to
the May 31, 2002 certification order on the
plaintiffs' claims and the statement that "there are no remaining
claims" does not constitute entry of judgment on the
plaintiffs' claims. Thus, this appeal is premature and we lack
jurisdiction. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate
jurisdiction.
DATED:
Honolulu, Hawai`i, March 2, 2004.