The opinion of the court, filed on May 2, 2000, is amended as follows (deletions are bracketed and additions are underscored):
1. Line 3 from the top of page 3: to such a requirement, but is not a sex offender, [may] raises a
2. Line 5 from the bottom of page 30: "to admit to a sex crime" implicated such a liberty interest under
3. Line 10 from the top of page 34: sufficient to support a HRPP Rule 40 post-conviction [proceeding] hearing.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to incorporate the foregoing changes in the original opinion.