I concur in the decision reached by the majority because "viewing the
evidence in the light most favorable to the State, there is substantial
evidence to support the conclusion of the trier of fact" that Defendant-Appellant
Randolph Earl Bush committed the offense of Harassment, in violation of
Hawai`i Revised Statutes § 711-1106(1)(f) (Supp. 2001). State
v. Hirayasu, 71 Haw. 587, 590, 801 P.2d 25, 26 (1990) (internal
quotation marks omitted). I agree with the majority that Bush's failure
to request that the trial court make special findings as to Bush's state
of mind precludes Bush from raising this issue on appeal. Hawaii Rules
of Penal Procedure Rule 23; State
v. Bigelow, 2 Haw. App. 654, 638 P.2d 873, 874 (1982) (general finding
of guilt sufficient when no request for special finding).