NOT FOR
PUBLICATION
NO. 25025
IN
THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI`I
STATE
OF HAWAI`I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
SIDNEY LAGARET, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT,
KANEOHE DIVISION
(HPD Traffic No. 001301610)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
(By: Watanabe, Acting C. J., Lim and Foley, JJ.)
On appeal, Lagaret contends the district court erred by denying his oral motion to dismiss because the State did not present articulable facts to warrant an investigative stop.
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we conclude the State presented specific and articulable facts such that a person of reasonable caution would believe that criminal activity was afoot and the investigative stop was justified. State v. Barnes, 58 Haw. 333, 338, 568 P.2d 1207, 1211 (1977).
Therefore,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Judgment filed on October 13, 2003 in the District Court of the First Circuit, Kaneohe Division, is affirmed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, May 12, 2004.
Paul J. Cunney,
R. Patrick McPherson, and
Victor J. Bakke,
for defendant-appellant.
1.
The Honorable Paula
Devens presided.