NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NO. 25465
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
JOSE
CRESPIN, Claimant-Appellant, v. A&B HAWAII, INC.,
dba: HAWAIIAN COMMERCIAL AND SUGAR COMPANY, and
ACCLAMATION INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES,
Employer/Insurance Adjuster-Appellee.
APPEAL
FROM THE LABOR AND
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD
(Case No. AB 2001-132(M) (7-98-03222))
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
(By: Burns, C.J., Lim and Foley, JJ.)
After a diligent review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and giving careful consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we conclude that Employer did not present substantial evidence to rebut the presumption of compensability promulgated in Hawaii Revised Statutes § 386-85(1) (1993), because we view the doctors' reports touted by Employer and relied upon by the Board, "as failing expressly, directly, and specifically to rebut the presumption because the reports did not address whether [Crespin's left shoulder injury] could have, in any way, been exacerbated [by his work activity]." Korsak v. Hawaii Permanente Med. Group, Inc., 94 Hawai`i 297, 308, 12 P.3d 1238, 1249 (2000) (emphases omitted). See also Nakamura v. State, 98 Hawai`i 263, 269, 47 P.3d 730, 736 (2002).
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the October 11, 2002 order of the Board is vacated and the cause is remanded for determination of the workers' compensation benefits due Crespin for his left shoulder injury.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, September 22, 2004.
Kevin H.S. Yuen,
for claimant-appellant.
Roland Q.F. Thom
and
Jaurene R. Judy
(Char Hamilton Campbell & Thom),
for employer/insurance adjuster-appellee.