NOT FOR
PUBLICATION
NO. 25642
IN
THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI`I
MAUNA
KEA AGRIBUSINESS CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
NALUAHI, et al., Defendant-Appellee,
and
JOSEPHINE H. RABAGO, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL
FROM THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT
(CIVIL NO. 02-1-228)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
(By: Watanabe, Acting C.J., Lim and Foley, JJ.)
On appeal, Rabago contends the circuit court erred by granting Plaintiff-Appellee Mauna Kea Agribusiness Co., Inc.'s (Mauna Kea) Summary Judgment Motion and by denying her Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Summary Judgment.
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we hold that the circuit court did not err by granting Mauna Kea's Summary Judgment Motion and denying Rabago's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Summary Judgment because Rabago did not present evidence that created a genuine issue of material fact. Fujimoto v. Au, 95 Hawai`i 116, 136-37, 19 P.3d 699, 719-20 (2001).
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Final Judgment filed on January 30, 2003 in the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit is affirmed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, May 26, 2004.
Josephine H.
Rabago,
defendant-appellant pro se.
1.
The
Honorable Greg K. Nakamura presided.