NOT FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
STATE
OF HAWAI`I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
WAYNE OLIVEIRA, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL
FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT
(CR. NO. 02-1-2121)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
(By: Watanabe, Acting C.J., Lim and Foley, JJ.)
On appeal, Oliveira contends the circuit court erred by granting the State's Motion in Limine as to the exclusion of the verdict in the case of another person charged separately in connection with the same episode for which Oliveira was charged. Upon careful review of the record and briefs submitted by the parties, we conclude that Oliveira's contention is without merit. "It is certainly true that a person accused of [a] crime may not introduce evidence of the acquittal of another person charged in connection with the same episode to create an impression before the jury that the defendant is equally innocent." Commonwealth v. Meredith, 493 Pa. 1, 7, 425 A.2d 334, 337 (1981). The same holds true, as in this case, when the other person was convicted of the included offense.
Therefore,
The Judgment filed on February 4, 2003 in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit is affirmed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, September 17, 2004.
On the briefs:Michael A. Glenn
for defendant-appellant.
Alexa D.M. Fujise,
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney,
City and County of Honolulu,
for plaintiff-appellee.
1.
The Honorable Derrick H.M. Chan presided.
2. Oliveira was
charged with violating Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS)
§ 707-712(1)(a) (1993) and was found guilty. We note that the
February 4,
2003 Judgment fails to set forth the HRS subsection under which
Oliveira was charged and convicted. The circuit court is hereby ordered
to file an
Amended Judgment setting forth nunc pro tunc the particular HRS
subsection of which Oliveira was convicted.