NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NO. 25810
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
LEWIS
W. POE, Complainant-Appellant, v.
HAWAII LABOR
RELATIONS BOARD, State of Hawaii,
Appellee-Appellee,
and HAWAII GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES
ASSOCIATION, AFSCME,
LOCAL 152, AFL-CIO,
Respondent-Appellee.
APPEAL
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
(CIV. NO. 02-1-0925)
After a thoughtful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and giving careful consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we hold that the circuit court was correct in affirming the Board's determination that Poe's prohibited labor practice complaint had been rendered moot by the Union's acquiescence in Poe's request for review of certain collective bargaining documents. See Carl Corp. v. State, Dep't of Educ., 93 Hawai`i 155, 164-65, 997 P.2d 567, 576-77 (2000). The exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply here because it cannot be said that the questions involved "affect the public interest and are capable of repetition yet evading review." Okada Trucking Co., Ltd. v. Bd. of Water Supply, 99 Hawai`i 191, 196-98, 53 P.3d 799, 804-06 (2002) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). See also McCabe Hamilton & Renny Co., Ltd. v. Chung, 98 Hawai`i 107, 120-21, 43 P.3d 244, 257-58 (App. 2002).
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the circuit court's April 9, 2003 final judgment and its underlying order of even date are affirmed.DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`, October 14, 2004.
Lewis W. Poe, pro se
complainant-appellant.
James E. T. Koshiba
and Neal K. Aoki
(Koshiba Agena & Kubota),
for respondent-appellee
Hawaii Government Employees
Association, AFSCME, Local 152,
AFL-CIO.
1.
The Honorable
Eden Elizabeth Hifo, judge presiding.