NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NO. 25551
IN
THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI`I
STATE
OF HAWAI`I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
CRAIG KOJI MUKAI, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL
FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT
(FC-Cr. No. 02-1-0121)
After a meticulous review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and giving careful consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we hold that the family court did not abuse its discretion in controlling the scope of Defendant's cross-examination of the complaining witness. Hawaii Rules of Evidence (HRE) Rule 403 (1993); State v. Balisbisana, 83 Hawai`i 109, 114, 924 P.2d 1215, 1220 (1996).
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the October 30, 2002 judgment of the family court is affirmed.DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, July 13, 2005.
On the briefs:
Steven D. Strauss,
for defendant-appellant.
Mary Ann
Holzl-Davis,
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney,
County of Hawai`i,
for plaintiff-appellee.