CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY FOLEY, J.
Pro se Defendant-Appellant Donna May Tarape (Tarape) contends her convictions are not "supported by substantial evidence." Tarape additionally contends the district court committed "reversable [sic] error by failing to follow the procedural mandates" set forth in Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 805-13 (Supp. 2004) in that "the police officer issuing the citations failed to cite the registered owner, and the District Court failed to require the registered owner to appear in court."
There are no transcripts in the record of any district court proceeding. Pursuant to Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 10(b)(1)(A) and (3), (1) Tarape "had a duty to include the relevant transcripts of proceedings as a part of the record on appeal." Lepere v. United Pub. Workers, Local 646, 77 Hawai`i 471, 474, 887 P.2d 1029, 1032 (1995). "Because the record on appeal does not contain any transcripts of the relevant hearings, . . . we therefore have an insufficient basis in the record before us to conclude" (Id.) that Tarape's convictions are not supported by substantial evidence and that the district court failed to follow the procedural mandates set forth in HRS § 805-13 as contended by Tarape.
Therefore, I would affirm.
1. Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 10(b)(1)(A) and (3) provides:
Rule 10. The record on appeal.
. . . .
(1) REQUEST TO PREPARE TRANSCRIPT.
. . . .