NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NO. 26628
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
STATE
OF HAWAI`I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
PIERRE APISALOMA, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT
(CR. NO. 02-1-0216)
After a meticulous review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and giving careful consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we hold that (1) Defendant waived his contention that the circuit court erred in denying the oral motion for judgment of acquittal he made at the close of the State's case, by thereafter introducing evidence, State v. Pudiquet, 82 Hawai`i 419, 423, 922 P.2d 1032, 1036 (App. 1996); and (2) there was substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the trier of fact. State v. Richie, 88 Hawai`i 19, 33, 960 P.2d 1227, 1241 (1998).
Therefore,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the May 19, 2004 judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, June 6, 2005.
Harry Eliason,
for defendant-appellant.
Michael S. Kagami,
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney,
County of Hawai`i,
for plaintiff-appellee.