NOT FOR PUBLICATION
CONCURRING OPINION BY FOLEY, J.
The Family Court of the Second Circuit (family court) did not err in holding that Defendant-Appellant Blue Liles (Liles) violated the temporary restraining order by contacting Penny Greenawalt (Greenawalt).
The Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (10th ed. 2000) defines "contact" as "an establishing of communication with someone or an observing [or] receiving of a significant signal from a person or object." Id. at 248 It defines "communication" as "a process by which information is exchanged between individuals through a common system of symbols, signs, or behavior." Id. at 232.
State v. Stanley, 110 Hawai`i 116, 124, 129 P.3d 1144, 1152 (App. 2005).The evidence
adduced in the family court
must be considered in the strongest light for the prosecution when the appellate court passes on the legal sufficiency of such evidence to support a conviction[.]
State v. Pone, 78 Hawai`i 262, 265, 892 P.2d 455, 458 (1995) (quoting State v. Batson, 73 Haw. 236, 248-49, 831 P.2d 924, 931 (1992)).
When Liles "turned to look over his shoulder right at Greenawalt and with large eyes kind of winked and smirked at her with kind of like a ha, ha, ha, I-got-you look, and just waved," Liles was establishing communication with Greenawalt and thus contacting Greenawalt.
Despite this contact in violation of the temporary restraining order, the family court abused its discretion in not§702-236 De minimis infractions. (1) The court may dismiss a prosecution if, having regard to the nature of the conduct alleged and the nature of the attendant circumstances, it finds that the defendant's conduct:
. . . .
The "harm or evil sought to be prevented by" HRS § 586-4 is "domestic abuse." State v. Wise, 107 Hawai`i 67, 71, 109 P.3d 708, 712 (App. 2005). Hawaii Revised Statutes § 586-1 (1993) defines "domestic abuse" as "[p]hysical harm, bodily injury, assault, or the threat of imminent physical harm, bodily injury, or assault, extreme psychological abuse or malicious property damage between family or household members[.]"
Given the nature of
Liles's conduct and the nature of the attendant
circumstances, the family court "abused its discretion by failing to
dismiss
[this] case under the § 702-236(1)(b) exception for conduct
causing harm 'too
trivial to warrant the condemnation of conviction.'" State
v. Akina,
73 Haw. 75,
77, 828 P.2d 269, 271 (1992).