NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI`I REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER
NO. 27712
The alleged offense occurred on December 16, 2004. On October 3, 2005, after a trial on August 10, 2005, the court entered Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
Viewing the record as a whole and in the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the court's decision that the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that, viewed objectively: (1) Leeks insulted and/or taunted Brass (i.e., the prohibited conduct); (2) the word Leeks used was so offensive that it was likely to provoke an immediate physical retaliation against Leeks by Brass or someone acting in the interest of Brass (i.e., the probable result of the prohibited conduct); and (3) Leeks did so with intent to harass, annoy, or alarm Brass (i.e., the requisite state of mind). See State v. Taliferro, 77 Hawai`i 196, 881 P.2d 1264 (App. 1994). Therefore, in accordance with Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 35, and after carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and duly considering and applying the law relevant to the issues raised and arguments presented,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the December 15, 2005 judgment is affirmed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, September 29, 2006.
1.
Judge Douglas
Ige presided.