NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI`I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
NO. 26595
IN
THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI`I
On appeal, the State argues that the circuit court erred in concluding that the State had failed to sustain its burden of showing that the warrantless search by Probation Officer Agra was justified. We disagree and affirm the Suppression Order.
A warrantless search is presumptively unreasonable and the State had the burden of showing that Probation Officer Agra's warrantless search was reasonable. State v. Propios, 76 Hawai`i 474, 477, 879 P.2d 1057, 1060 (1994). The State chose not to call Probation Officer Agra as a witness at the suppression hearing and instead agreed to have Machado's suppression motion decided on stipulated facts. We hold that the circuit court did not err in 1) concluding that the State failed to meet its burden of showing that Probation Officer Agra's warrantless search was justified and 2) granting Machado's motion to suppress the evidence seized by Probation Officer Agra.
After a careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, we affirm the "Order Granting Motion to Suppress" filed on May 19, 2004, in the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, February 22, 2007.
On the briefs:
Jason M. Skier
1.
The Honorable Terence T. Yoshioka presided.