NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI`I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
NO. 27722
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI`I
After a diligent review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and giving careful consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we resolve Defendant's points of error on appeal as follows:
1. Because the citing officer had "reasonable suspicion that [Defendant] was engaged in criminal conduct[,]" State v. Eleneki, 106 Hawai`i 177, 180, 102 P.3d 1075, 1078 (2004) (citation, internal quotation marks and emphasis omitted), the district court's denial of Defendant's August 15, 2005 motion to suppress evidence and statements was correct. Id.
2. Because Defendant did not object below to his enhanced sentence for driving without no-fault insurance, he waived his contention on appeal that the district court abused its discretion in imposing it. State v. Watson, 71 Haw. 258, 259, 787 P.2d 691, 692 (1990); State v. Hoglund, 71 Haw. 147, 150-51, 785 P.2d 1311, 1313 (1990) (citation omitted). Indeed, the record of proceedings below reflects that the enhanced sentence was affirmatively "conceded by the [D]efendant[.]" State v. Afong, 61 Haw. 281, 282, 602 P.2d 927, 929 (1979).
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the two January 4, 2006 judgments of the district court are affirmed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, April 13, 2007.
On the briefs:
1.
The Honorable
Valerie Chang presided.