NO. 28484
IN
THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF
THE STATE OF HAWAI`I
VAIDA L. GEORGE,
Appellant-Appellant, v.
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, Appellee-Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIRST CIRCUIT
(Civ. No. 02-1-1399)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
(By: Lim, Presiding J., Foley, and Nakamura, JJ.)
Upon review of the record, it appears that we do not have jurisdiction
over
Appellant-Appellant Vaida L. George's (Appellant George) appeal from
the December
15, order (the Order). "When a written judgment, order, or decree ends
the
litigation by fully deciding all rights and liabilities of all parties,
leaving
nothing further to be adjudicated, the judgment, order, or decree is
final and
appealable." Casumpang v.
ILWU, Local 142, 91 Hawai`i 425, 426, 984 P.2d 1251,
1252 (1999) (citation omitted). The Order ended the litigation by fully
deciding
the rights of all the parties. Therefore, it was an appealable final
judgment
under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 383-41 (Supp.
2006), 91-15 (1993), and 641-1(a) (Supp. 2006). However, Appellant
George did not file her January 15, 2004
notice of appeal within thirty days after entry of the
December 15, 2003 Order
and, thus, violated the thirty-day time limit under Hawai`i Rules of
Appellate
Procedure (HRAP) Rule 4(a)(1) for filing a notice of appeal.
Therefore, Appellant
George's notice of appeal was not timely.
The failure to
file a timely notice of appeal in a civil matter is a
jurisdictional defect that the parties cannot waive and the appellate
courts
cannot disregard in the exercise of judicial discretion. Bacon v. Karlin, 68 Haw.
648, 650, 727 P.2d 1127, 1129 (1986); HRAP Rule 26(b) ("no court or
judge or
justice thereof is authorized to change the jurisdictional requirements
contained
in Rule 4 of [the HRAP]"). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate
jurisdiction.
DATED: Honolulu,
Hawai`i, April 25, 2007.