NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
NO. 28538
IN
THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSEPH EUGENE RIVEIRA, Defendant-Appellant
On appeal, Riveira contends that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of reckless driving. In particular, Riveira contends that there was insufficient evidence to prove that: 1) he acted with a reckless state of mind and 2) his conduct was a gross deviation from the standard of conduct that a law-abiding person would observe in the same situation.
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, we disagree with Riveira and conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support his conviction. Viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, State v. Richie, 88 Hawai‘i 19, 33, 960 P.2d 1227, 1241 (1998), the evidence showed that late at night, Riviera revved his engine, causing his tires to screech as he drove by Officer Bryant Ho at a high rate of speed; that Riviera went around one vehicle and passed another; and that Riviera's car was traveling at approximately 105 miles per hour in an area where the speed limit was 55 miles per hour. There was substantial evidence to support Riviera's reckless driving conviction. See State v. Agard, 113 Hawai‘i 321, 151 P.3d 802 (2007).
Accordingly, we affirm the May 1, 2007, Judgment of the district court.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, June 9, 2008.
1. The Honorable Alvin K. Nishimura presided.
2. Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291-2 (2007) provides: