NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
NO. 29377
IN
THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Defendant-Appellant Robert Michael Anderson aka Robert M. Anderson (Anderson) appeals from the Judgment filed on August 28, 2008 in the District Court of the First Circuit, Honolulu Division (district court). (1)
The district court convicted Anderson of Operating a Vehicle Under the Influence of an Intoxicant (OVUII), in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 291E-61(a)(1) and 291E-61(b)(1) (2007 Repl.), and disregarding traffic lane markings, in violation of HRS § 291C-38 (2007 Repl.). (2)
On appeal, Anderson contends the district court erred by convicting him of OVUII because the oral charge made by the State of Hawai‘i (State) was insufficient because the State failed to allege the essential element that Anderson operated or assumed actual physical control of a vehicle upon a public way, street, road, or highway.
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, as well as the relevant statutory and case law, we conclude that the charge was sufficient because the State need not allege that Anderson was traveling on a public way, street, road, or highway in order to convict him of violating HRS §§ 291E-61(a)(1) and 291E-61(b)(1). State v. Ruggiero, 114 Hawai‘i 227, 240-41, 160 P.3d 703, 716-17 (2007); State v. Kekuewa, 114 Hawai‘i 411, 426, 163 P.3d 1148, 1163 (2007); see also Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 118-19 (1974); United States v. Wicks, 187 F.3d 426, 428 (4th Cir. 1999); State v. Kern, 67 P.3d 272, 278 (Mont. 2003).
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Judgment filed on August 28, 2008 in the District Court of the First Circuit, Honolulu Division, is affirmed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, September 4, 2009.
On the briefs:
1.
The Honorable William Cardwell presided.
2.
Anderson has not appealed his conviction for HRS § 291C-38.