vs.
TIOLU LONO and IOSEFO FALANIKO, Defendants-Appellees
On appeal, the State raises the following points of error: (1) the circuit court abused its discretion in dismissing the indictment, inasmuch as Appellees were not denied a fair and impartial grand jury proceeding; and (2) the circuit court erred in suppressing Lono's field show-up identification because the identification was not "unreliable."
Upon carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and having given due consideration to the arguments advanced and the issues raised, we hold that: (1) the circuit court abused its discretion in dismissing the indictment, inasmuch as testimony elicited during the grand jury proceeding did not clearly appear to have improperly influenced the grand jurors, see State v. Scotland, 58 Haw. 474, 477, 572 P.2d 497, 499 (1977); and (2) the circuit court erred in suppressing Lono's field show-up identification, inasmuch as the court's findings of fact do not support its conclusion that the identification was "unreliable," see State v. Okumura, 78 Hawai`i 383, 391, 894 P.2d 80, 88 (1995). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the orders from which the appeal is taken are reversed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai`i, March 22, 2005.
Louis Michael
Ching
for the defendant-appellee
Tiolu Lono
Cindy A.L.
Goodness,
Deputy Public Defender,
for the defendant-appellee
Iosefo Falaniko