STATE OF HAWAI`I, Plaintiff-Appellee
vs.
PAME
ANN MARY LEILANI ROMANO, Defendant-Appellant
The majority opinion of the court, filed on February 27, 2007, is amended as follows (deletions are bracketed and additions are double underscored):
Lines 3-4 from the top of page 9: for keeping numerous roosters at his home[, resulting in complaints from neighbors]. Id. at 355, 873 P.2d at 112. At
Line 5 from the top of page 16: made. See id. [at 46, 137 P.3d at 360.]
Line 5 from the bottom of page 16: testify to any "use of, or a threat of use, [with] unlawful force
Lines
2-3 from the top of page 17: preponderance of the evidence was clearly
erroneous. See [Fisher, 111 Hawai`i at 46,
137 P.3d at 360] Foo, 106 Hawai`i at
112, 102 P.3d at 356.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to incorporate the foregoing changes in the original opinion and take all necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these changes.
DATED: Honolulu,
Hawai`i, March 30, 2007.
1. Considered by Moon,
C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ. Levinson, J., having dissented,
takes
no position on this amendment.