NO. 28407
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI`I
FRANCIS ANTHONY GRANDINETTI, II, Petitioner,
vs.
STANTON C. OSHIRO and CIRCUIT COURT
OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT,
Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CR. NO. 93-141)
ORDER
(By: Moon,
C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Francis Grandinetti, II's "application
for an appellate injunction and supervisory
mandamus remedy," which is deemed a petition for a writ of mandamus and
the papers in support, it appears that petitioner
fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the relief
requested and petitioner is not entitled to a writ of
mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai`i
200, 204-205, 982 P.2d 334, 338-339 (1999) (A
writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless
the
petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a
lack of
alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the
requested
action.). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu,
Hawai`i, March 21, 2007.
Francis Grandinetti, II,
pro se, on the petition