NO. 27662
STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Plaintiff-Appellee-Respondent,
ISAIAH
I. KINI, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.
Upon consideration of the application for writ of certiorari filed on August 18, 2008 by the defendant-appellant-petitioner Isaiah I. Kini, it appears that the application was filed by Kini pro se, but that he is represented by appointed appellate counsel. Kini has not obtained appointed counsel's discharge pursuant to Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 50(c) or withdrawal from the appellate court or the circuit court pursuant to HRAP Rule 50(b), and he does not have a constitutional right to hybrid representation, see State v. Hirano, 8 Haw. App. 330, 333-36, 802 P.2d 482, 484-85 (1990). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ of certiorari is dismissed without prejudice to an application filed by appointed counsel of record or by Kini pro se upon appointed
counsel's discharge or withdrawal effected by the appellate court or the circuit court.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, August 25, 2008.
1. Considered by:
Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.