ORDER
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and
Duffy, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Glenn Mizukami's "Original Action for Writ to Intermediate Court of Appeals," which is deemed a petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought. Consequently, petitioner is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai‘i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
DATED:
Honolulu,
Hawai‘i, August 7, 2008.