NO. 22239
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,
vs.
BURTON
D. GOULD, Respondent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Re Application for Reinstatement of
BURTON
D. GOULD, Petitioner.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING MOTION PURSUANT TO
RULE 60((b)(6)
OF THE HAWAI‘I RULES OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE
(By:
Nakayama, J., for the court (1))
Upon consideration of the
Petitioner Burton D. Gould's "Motion Pursuant to Section 60(b)(6) of
the Hawai‘i Rules of
Civil Procedure," the memorandum and affidavit in support thereof, and
the record, it appears: (1) Petitioner Gould
incorrectly concludes that Chief Justice Moon recused himself from this
case when he appointed Retired Justice Steven
H. Levinson to temporarily preside on the Hawai'i Supreme Court to hear
and determine any and all matters in this case. Chief Justice Moon did
not recuse himself from this case; he appointed former Justice Levinson
to fill the vacancy on
the court created by Justice Levinson's retirement, in accordance with
Article VI, Section 2 of the Hawai‘i Constitution
(as amended 1986) and Hawai‘i Revised Statutes § 602-10 (Supp.
2007); (2) Petitioner Gould believes that he is being
unfairly discriminated against because of his race, his
age, and previous illness. See
Affidavit ¶ 8. However, the record
contains no evidence to support this belief; and (3) Chief Justice
Moon's November 20, 2008 opinion in Office
of
Disciplinary Counsel v. Gould did not "contain[ ]
misrepresentations, misstatements of testimony, and depicts
a pre-existing prejudice against [Petitioner Gould]," see
Affidavit ¶ 17. On the contrary, the opinion fairly
reflected the
opinion of the court on the weight of the evidence in that case.
Finally, it appears that Petitioner Gould's motion is his
third attempt to have this court reconsider its opinion and order
denying his petition for reinstatement. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion
is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner
Gould shall not file any motion or other document in this court seeking
reconsideration, review, or reversal of this court's opinion filed
November 20, 2008. This order is without prejudice to
a petition for reinstatement filed with the Disciplinary Board,
pursuant to RSCH 2.17(c), and a Disciplinary Board
report and recommendation thereon.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, June 16, 2009.
1.
Considered by: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.and Retired
Justice Levinson, appointed by reason of vacancy on January 15,
2009.