It appearing that the one-page document, entitled "Proceeding a Cert," filed by petitioner-appellant James T. Shipman on November 9, 2009, which this court treats as an application for a writ of certiorari, fails to comply with Rule 40.1(d) of the Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP), (2)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the "application" is dismissed without prejudice to Shipman's re-filing an application for writ of certiorari (3) that complies with HRAP 40.1 and serving such application in the manner and as required by HRAP 25(b).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, November 16, 2009.
James T. Shipman,
1. Court: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and Recktenwald, JJ.
2. HRAP Rule 40.1(d) provides an application for writ of certiorari must contain the following:
(2) A statement of prior proceedings in the case.
(3) A short statement of the case containing the facts material to the consideration of the questions presented.
(4) A brief argument with supporting authorities.
A copy of the challenged opinion, dispositional order, or ruling of the [ICA] shall be attached as an appendix.
3. Inasmuch as the judgment on
appeal was filed on October 21, 2009, the time for bringing an
application for writ of
certiorari will not expire until January 19, 2010. See Hawai‘i Revised
Statutes § 602-59.