NO. 29723
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
RICHARD BLAISDELL, Petitioner,
vs.
CIRCUIT COURT
OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI‘I
and
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CIVIL NO.
04-1-1455)
ORDER
(By: Moon,
C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ. and
Circuit Judge Raffetto, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by
petitioner Richard Blaisdell, the papers in support, and the answer by
respondent Circuit Court of the First Circuit, it appears that
petitioner, having prevailed in his appeal of Civil No. 04-1-1455, has
a clear and indisputable right to the declaratory and other relief
sought from the circuit court and from defendant Department of
Public Safety in Civil No. 04-1-1455. See Blaisdell v. Department of Public
Safety, 119 Hawai‘i 275, 196 P.3d 277 (2008). Civil No.
04-1-1455 was
remanded to the circuit court on December 2, 2008 with instructions to
enter a declaratory judgment and certain orders, but such
judgment and orders have not been entered to date. Petitioner moved the
circuit court on February 9, 2009 to expeditiously dispose of Civil No.
04-1-1455, but the circuit court further delayed disposition by
reassigning the case on February 11, 2009 and again reassigning the
case sometime after March 27, 2009. Any further delay in disposing of
Civil No. 04-1-1455 would be contrary to the circuit court's duty to
promptly and efficiently dispose of the case. Therefore, petitioner is
entitled to mandamus relief. See
Kema v. Gaddis, 91
Hawai‘i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an
extraordinary remedy that will issue where the petitioner
demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of
alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or
obtain the requested action.). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is granted. The
Circuit Court of the First Circuit, shall, by June 1, 2009: (1) enter a
judgment in Civil No. 04-1-1455 declaring
plaintiff Richard Blaisdell's "restricted" account violative of HRS
§ 353-20 and order such relief to plaintiff as may be appropriate
as a result of such declaration, and (2) order interest to the extent
due
but not yet credited, to be paid on plaintiff's accounts.
DATED: Honolulu,
Hawai‘i, May 12, 2009.